Rationalizations Over Common Goals: The Real Rioters (EP.296)

Our common enemy as the world’s oldest democracy is not Trump, antifa, Nancy Pelosi, AOC, QAnon, or Bernie. The enemy is rationalization.
Our common enemy as the world’s oldest democracy is rationalization.


Our common enemy as the world’s oldest democracy is not Trump, antifa, Nancy Pelosi, AOC, QAnon, or Bernie. The enemy is rationalization, the destructive thinking that says that we and others like us are in the right, and those who do not think like us are just wrong. And that being right is license to do whatever it takes to rid the world of the other side.

That is the subject of today’s 10-minute episode. 


Let me make a few stark points to kick off today’s episode:

  1. Whatever it takes is another way of saying that the ends justify the means. Not true. All means are ends in and of themselves.
  2. There was no justification for the months-long antifa and BLM violence in the Spring and Summer, any more than there was justification for the recent violence at the Capitol. The egregious and deadly attack on our democracy lasted two hours, with Congress safely returning to its duties, including certifying the defeat of an out-of-control President.
  3. Civil liberties are under massive attack. An attack on any one person or philosophy is an attack on us all.
  4. It is time for us, We The People, to lead. If we want better candidates and better office holders, we need to be better citizens and voters.

Have I gotten your attention?

Let’s hear from different voices. “In The Friends of Voltaire, Evelyn Beatrice Hall wrote the phrase: ‘I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.’ as an illustration of Voltaire’s beliefs. This quotation–which is sometimes misattributed to Voltaire himself–is often cited to describe the principle of freedom of speech.” Regardless of attribution, let’s all adopt the principle.

“I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.” is the desired principle. Today, it is more like, “I disapprove of what you say, and will make damn sure that you don’t get to say it again. And that the world sees you and everything you believe as being  painted with the indelible brushes of racism, sexism, or whatever else I think of at the time.”

The hundreds of Black Lives Matter and antifa protests which resulted in the destruction of thousands of businesses, lost lives and still-dark city blocks, were often justified as social justice protests. Various politicians, media personalities and activists did a once over lightly on any violence, declaring them to have been “mostly peaceful.” By that exact measure, WWII was “mostly peaceful.” The mostly peaceful claim referring to the protests that included burning, rioting, seizing public and personal property, and injury and death, rests on the observation that most of the people, most of the time, were peaceful. And that is correct. In war, in this case WWII, only a minority of those in uniform were anywhere near the front lines, and only a fraction of those ever saw actual combat. The same misuse of logic that defends the mostly peaceful claim for the Spring and Summer violence would have to call WWII mostly peaceful as well.

From the beginning of the more recent social justice protests, prominent voices have defended the violence as being quintessentially American, reminding anyone who would listen that America was born in violence. Many of them cited the Boston Tea Party as an example. They clearly relied on widespread ignorance of history to make the case for any legitimate similarity. The Boston Tea Party destroyed government property, and that was it. No one was hurt, nothing was stolen for either sale or personal use. No protesters went to the homes and shops bordering the harbor to loot, burn, injure and kill. They tossed boxes of tea into salt water. BTW, when I tried to make this case on social media, I was assaulted as a racist. No other argument; I disagreed with the comparison, so I was racist. Ipso facto. 

Seattle Mayor Jenny Durkan participated in a June 11, 2020 interview with CNN’s Chris Cuomo, during which she suggested the occupied protest around the city’s east police precinct could simply be a “summer of love.” Portland Mayor Ted Wheeler took a similar approach, recanting only recently after he finally realized that antifa and their ilk are only encouraged by conciliatory approaches. Had Mr. Wheeler read almost any history book, he would have saved his citizens a lot of pain and heartache.

Let’s also look at the death of Ms. Ashli Babbitt, a white Capitol trespasser. “Ms. Babbitt had left the Air Force after two wars and 14 years, settling near the working-class San Diego suburb where she was raised. Life after the military was not easy. After briefly working security at a nuclear power plant, she was struggling to keep a pool-supply company afloat. As a civilian, she found herself newly free to express her political views. Her social media feed was a torrent of messages celebrating President Trump; QAnon conspiracy theories; and tirades against immigration, drugs and Democratic leaders in California.

“For a period, Ms. Babbitt was also a supporter of President Barack Obama. In a November 2018 Twitter exchange first reported by Bellingcat, Ms. Babbitt said she had voted for Mr Obama, a Democrat, calling him ‘our president’. ‘I think Obama did great things,’ she wrote. ‘I think he did do a lot of good…at a time where we needed him.’ But Ms. Babbitt ‘could not’ vote for Hillary Clinton, she said, going for Mr. Trump instead. Days before this week’s demonstrations, she wrote on Twitter that she would be in Washington for Mr. Trump’s so-called Stop the Steal rally.”

The unarmed Ms. Babbitt pushed to the very front of the crowd and climbed through the smashed door into the Speaker’s Lobby. A single shot rang out and Babbitt fell to the floor, mortally wounded. Taking up the case that things would have been different had the rioters been black, here I agree. Many and loud voices would be claiming police brutality, saying that trespassing is not a crime punishable by death. There would be hours upon hours of interviews with the late Ms. Babbitt’s grieving and protesting family and friends. Ashli Babbitt’s name would be added to t-shirts, posters and sports attire. “Say her name.

Ms. Babbitt earned her fate, as did others, including Michael Brown. And the BLM, antifa and Capitol Hill violence were all inexcusable. Here’s what the next steps need to be:

  1. Donald Trump proves his much-professed love for America and resigns. The 25th Amendment will not be invoked, and a second impeachment, on the heels of the trumped up Russia investigation impeachment, smacks loudly of continuing political theater. His resignation would be clean and noble. Quoting my new friend, Beverly Bruce, “Trump is done. No bank, no Wall Street firm, and no legitimate deal person, no media, will go near him now. It is very possible now that he will be forced into personal bankruptcy within two years.” Pray that any attempt at Trump 2024 is painfully stillborn.
  2. All of us must do the hard and painfully uncomfortable work of challenging our own thinking, testing and retesting all of our preconceived notions. Broaden our sources of facts and information to include news outlets and people with whom we strongly disagree. Find the common goals, they do indeed exist, research applicable facts (use standard rules of evidence here), apply non agenda-based reasoning and achieve the desired common goals. Together. This process works.

It is timely and useful to repeat a recent FB post of mine. “This Unaffiliated voter is not a RINO (Republican in Name Only); I am a RIPO (Republican in Policy Only). I agree with most core Republican political and financial policies, but I find several of the leading Republican politicians impossible to support. And their “true believer” followers are no better. To paraphrase Gandhi, “I like your policies, I do not like your practitioners. Your practitioners are so unlike your policies.”

We will close with an email quote from Igor Sill, a dear and respected friend for decades, “It is my belief that we must all help in this transition towards making 2021 a year of a renewed human renaissance.” Amen, and amen.

Tell me what you believe. I and many others want to know. 

As always, whatever you do, do it in love. Without love, anything we do is empty.


As we get ready to wrap up, please do respond in the episodes with comments or questions about this episode or anything that comes to mind, or connect with me on Twitter, @willluden, Facebook, facebook.com/will.luden, and LinkedIn, www.linkedin.com/in/willluden/. And you can subscribe on your favorite device through Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Spotify and wherever you listen to podcasts.

If you liked today’s episode, other episodes or the revolution2-0.org site itself, visit the store for some fun items, comment, subscribe, and encourage others to subscribe with you. Each One Reach One will help spread the word about Revolution 2.0™.

Will Luden, coming to you from 7,200’ in Colorado Springs.

Will Luden
Join Me
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on pinterest

10 Responses

  1. Charles Cabral Reply

    As you probably saw on my Facebook post, Benjamin Franklin put it well, “He who lies down with dogs rises with fleas.” Those who have supported the Twit because they agree with many of his stands (which I do also) should now see the folly of allying with “deplorables” (as Her Royal Clintness, HRC) put it). Destroying the nation is not the way to make it better, although God may have a different idea. Remember, the ends don’t justify the means: The means are part of the ends.

    • Will Luden Reply

      Charlie, are you putting all 75 million Trump voters in the “…lies down with dogs…destroying the nation…” category?

      • Charles Cabral Reply

        Welll, I guess maybe some well-intentioned folks really believed that the Twit would somehow grow into the presidency and not try to destroy the country. For them, probably a hot shower will get rid of the parasites. On the other hand, those who bought into the “stolen election” fallacy should be searching on line for some really strong flea soap.
        Then there are the Republican office holders who toed the Twit line for the past four years. They have probably done irreparable damage to the GOP. They and the party likely have contracted an incurable case of the mange. Here in the PRH, the Republicans, who only hold 6 or 7 of the 75 seats in the legislature actually drove a couple of their office holders out of the party for not being Twit loyalists. I don’t see a way for that label to regain any respectability in the foreseeable future.

        • Will Luden Reply

          Charlie, you should ask for at least a partial refund on those Anger Management classes…:). Cheers, Will

          • Charles Cabral

            Will, you’re probably right. I am angry and starting to understand why my Black friends felt such uncontrollable anger at the George Floyd incident. Something in my basic identity as an American was attacked on Jan 6, much as their basic self identification was in the Floyd killing.

          • Will Luden

            Charlie, I agree with everything that you wrote; Black Lives do indeed Matter. But do all Black Lives Matter? If so, where is the grief anger at the 99.5% of black gun homicides not committed by police? And George Floyd. No one can rationally defend the actions of the cops. Does Mr. Floyd bear any responsibility, or is all with the cops? The autopsy showed that he had a “normally fatal amount of fentanyl” in his system. Video from earlier in the incident showed him standing, repeatedly claiming, “I can’t breathe.” Thoughts?

          • Charles Cabral

            I did not intend to make a judgment for or against the Floyd killing,only to say that I have a better understanding of why many Black people responded with anger that they could not comprehend when witnessing an apparent assault on a symbol of their self identity.

          • Will Luden

            Hi Charlie, we are far more in agreement here than not. I will keep trying to separate the fly poop from the pepper when it comes to things like feelings v facts, and the use of carefully selected, often anecdotal, information (not you!) to prove larger points. I very much appreciate you and your comments, BTW. Oh, I was thinking about some of your comments when I wrote tomorrow’s episode. Cheers, Will

  2. Eric Rodgman Reply

    Well said — I suspect that most of the 75 million Trump voters are RIPOs — hopefully they will do as you described and become more involved in being responsible and sensible about picking candidates in the near future. I am still waiting to see if Trump will resign. Blessings to you Will and your family. Keep up the good work — in His love and grace — Eric.

Leave a Reply

Recent Episodes

Subscribe to Revolution 2.0

* indicates required

Follow me On Social

Subscribe to Podcast


Scroll to top
Skip to content