America’s Cultural Revolution: Leading To One Party Rule? (EP.339)

We are deep into the dangerous beginnings of our own cultural revolution, a culture war, with its intention of establishing one party rule.
We are deep into our own cultural revolution, a culture war.

Introduction

Speaking of history, as we often do here at Revolution 2.0™, what do you know about the Cultural Revolution in China? This 10 year long socio-political purge under Chairman Mao, 1966-1976, The Cultural Revolution damaged China’s economy and traditional culture, along with incurring a death toll estimated to have been in the millions. 

We are deep into the dangerous beginnings of our own cultural revolution, a culture war, with its intention of establishing one party rule.

That is the subject of today’s 10 minute episode.

Continuing

Mao Zedong, Chairman of the Chinese Communist Party from its founding in 1949 until his death in 1976, was well practiced in mass killing in pursuit of his goals. His ill conceived Great Leap Forward, a five-year plan of forced agricultural collectivization and rural industrialization, 1958-1962, resulted in the deaths of up to 40M people, making Mao the greatest mass murderer of all time–even greater than Joseph Stalin, the Russian dictator from 1927 until his demise in 1953. Hitler and Naxi Germany take a distant third place when it comes to mass murder. Mao and Stalin claimed to have been Marxist-Leninists, and Hitler labeled his party Socialist. What they were all really up to was seizing and holding power in their one-party states. Their announced political philosophies were for convenience only; their real tools were rhetoric, centering around passionate misinformation, and ruthless intimidation, including mass incarceration, murder and torture on a stunning scale.

Today in America, the Gang of Four, the pollsters, the Left, the Mainstream Media and Big Tech, are pushing to have one party rule here in the US. Their tools are rhetoric, centering around passionate misinformation, and ruthless intimidation though cancelling and shaming. The Goal of the Gang of Four, is to manipulate elections in a way that no Republican is ever again elected to national office–and very few to state office. 

The most subtle, yet the most powerful, way for the Gang to succeed in its mission is to support and encourage the less concerned, less involved, unmotivated and generally unknowledgeable voters to take a few minutes every four years to cast a ballot. These are the voters who know little or nothing about either our unique purpose or history as a nation. Few of them could answer basic civics questions, or even identify key political leaders. Most importantly these voters grab onto appealing cliches and sound bites instead of doing any checks-ins with opposing opinions and policy recommendations. The Gang works to create the false impression that if anything in life is hard, is not what is wanted or is merely inconvenient, then it is unfair and needs to be remedied by government. And the Democrats, they claim correctly, will provide those remedies for you through the government, while Republicans won’t. 

At its core, America was built on a culture of hard work over time, faith in a higher power, respect for authority and a high regard for education. Today, hard work is slowly beginning to be replaced with taxpayer dependency, the higher power is the government, authority is disrespected simply because it represents authority, and education and knowledge are being replaced with indoctrination and certificates. I remember being taught in school that the family is the basis of the state. That made immediate sense when I first heard it in Junior High. Stronger families make for stronger societies, and logically stronger societies make for a stronger state. Today, it is inverted; the family needs the approval of and support from the state for almost everything from financial assistance to the remaining freedoms that individuals and families are free to exercise.

The American economy, guided and fortified by free markets, hard work over time and ingenuity and creativity, is by far the strongest the world has ever seen. And that continues, e.g., Walmart was founded in 1962, Amazon in 1994 and Tesla in 2003. Our national character was memorialized long before in 1776 and 1787 with the signings of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. Yet our national character, currently under heavy assault, can die in one or two generations. Our economy, also under attack from dangers like massive and mounting debt and government subsidies that discourage work, will remain strong, though continually weakening, far longer. And if we repair, resurrect and even improve the national character, and there is certainly room for improvement, the economy will take care of itself. And we will be better as people, and as a people.

I want to share some personal stories that fit quite well here. Two of my sons went to a wonderful private preK-5 school, Belmont Oak Academy, not surprisingly in Belmont, CA. While the Asian Moms there were asking for more homework for their kids, other Moms were asking for less. A friend of mine, Bill G., lived in a high rise condo building in Cupertino, CA. The units were owned mostly by Asians. Bill, an excellent CFO for hire, worked late into the evening. He noted that many other units also had their lights on late as the kids studied well into the night. My eldest attended Carlmont HS, a public school for his Freshman year before transferring to Serra High, a nominally Catholic private school. He summed up the difference by saying to me, “Dad the academics are not all that different. What is different is that at Carlmont if you do your homework you need to do it on the down low for fear of being ridiculed. At Serra, if you do not do your homework, the reaction from the students is, ‘Hey, what’s up with that?’” 

My point in recounting these stories is that we are busy creating a society where hard work and accomplishment are being punished and even ridiculed. A growing number of school districts and colleges are ending or simply ignoring standardized tests simply because they don’t like seeing certain groups consistently succeed. Harvard is being credibly accused of tilting the admittance process away from Asians despite their superior qualifications because they value diversity over merit. As I was growing up, Horatio Alger stories were still spoken of with respect. These juvenile novels share essentially the same theme: a teenage boy improves his circumstances by virtuous behavior. Today, these stories would be angrily criticized as examples of white privilege and an unfair playing field. 

But the evidence does not support that claim. Less than a month ago, on May 28th, I published an episode which in part observed that there were 8.1M job openings, then a record. Today the number of jobs going begging has soared to 9.1M, all while the number of job seekers falls. To top it off, workers are quitting at the highest level in two decades. In April, the share of U.S. workers leaving jobs was 2.7%, according to the Labor Department, a jump from 1.6% a year earlier, over at 50% increase, to the highest level since at least 2000.

It does not take an Horatio Alger to apply for and get a job, certainly not in this job market. It does require pride and a measure of personal responsibility. But those essential personal characteristics are being undermined as part of the culture war by increased jobless payments, overall welfare increases, and most perniciously, a culture shaped and driven by much of the media and many politicians that declares that if you are non-white, and worse, also not male, that you are a victim worthy of being supported by the taxpayers.

The Brooking Institute announced the results of a study well worth noting. If someone at least finishes high school, gets a full-time job and waits until age 21 to get married and have children, there is only a 2 percent they will be in poverty and a 75 percent chance they will be in the middle class. There were no qualifications or exceptions about race, gender or political affiliation. 

Today’s Key Point: One party rule states like Russia, China (neither have ever been democratically ruled) and Nazi Germany did not first go to their political, military and economic extremes and then bar political competiton. They first established one party rule, then went to their extremes. A good example is Nazi Germany. Hitler began his active political career in 1923, became the democratically elected Chancellor in 1933, and declared himself Führer, essentially dictator, in 1934. The horrors started in 1938 with Kristallnacht, the widespread destruction of Jewish property and violence against Jews, and the opening of the Auschwitz death camp in 1940. Remember that earlier we said that the Gang of Four, the pollsters, the Left, the Mainstream Media and Big Tech, are pushing to establish one party rule here in the US. 

Where do you stand? What are you going to do? Remember, it does not matter where you stand if you don’t do anything. You can start by subscribing to these episodes, and encouraging others to subscribe with you.

As always, whatever you do, do it in love. Without love, anything we do is empty. 1 Corinthians 16:14

Contact

As we get ready to wrap up, please do respond in the episodes with comments or questions about this episode or anything that comes to mind, or connect with me on Twitter, @willluden, Facebook, facebook.com/will.luden, and LinkedIn, www.linkedin.com/in/willluden/. And you can subscribe on your favorite device through Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Spotify and wherever you listen to podcasts.

If you liked today’s episode, other episodes or the revolution2-0.org site itself, visit the store for some fun items, comment, subscribe, and encourage others to subscribe with you. Each One Reach One will help spread the word about Revolution 2.0™.

Will Luden, coming to you from 7,200’ in Colorado Springs.

Will Luden
Join Me
Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on google
Google+
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on pinterest
Pinterest

6 Responses

  1. Mary Schaller Reply

    Great post, Will. I think what you have said is true. Will the American people stop it before it is too late? The elimination of God from the culture is another tell-tale sign of these other regimes that is happening in America.

  2. Jeff Kowell Reply

    The horrors in China were divided into two parts: The Great Leap Forward and The Cultural Revolution. Death from the purges estimated between 35-40 million people.

    What I find so strange is during WWII, the Japanese killed millions of Chinese civilians. Once free of Japanese tyranny, the Chinese government turned on their own people and did much more to their own people than their Japanese conquerors ever did.

    These are lessons from history that most Americans never learn about, much less see warning signs in our own society. Sad and scary.

  3. Terry Tracy Reply

    Straight to the heart of the issue, culture and, unfortunately, politics is downstream of culture. I’ve had this argument with people over sports. My line of reasoning “if you want equality why not start with sports?” The common reply “because blacks are more athletic!” My reply “but whites are smarter, that’s why we have all the CEO jobs.” “That’s not true!” is the usual reply. “And blacks aren’t more athletic.” I state. “Yes they are!” comes the angry reply. “And whites are smarter!” I fire back. And so on and so forth until I think they can stand it no longer at which time I explain “the truth is blacks are not more athletic than whites and whites are not smarter than blacks. It is a matter of culture. A black child is handed a basketball or football the day they learn to walk so sure by the time they hit high school they are naturals at sports. What is a white child handed? Usually a book. It’s called culture. Teach a child he can succeed and most likely he will. Teach a child that those in authority are out to get him, hold him back, hold him down, even imprison him and you teach a self destruction that will most likely bring him and many of those around him down. OK, if you’ve made it this far I congratulate myself on making it interesting, or at least, provocative enough to finish. The point, why are we dumbing down society, through the government, instead of lifting society up? I seriously doubt many of those in government are raising their children in this way. And why, as parents aren’t more of us admonishing our children instead of burdening them? Oh wait, culture again.

Leave a Reply

Recent Episodes

Subscribe to Revolution 2.0

* indicates required

Follow me On Social

Subscribe to Podcast

SUPPORT THE REVOLUTION

Scroll to top
X
Skip to content